Sport Sponsorship is Broken, The Fix & The $190 BILLION Opportunity!

Why is the industry pouring record-breaking sums into sports sponsorship when the majority of marketers admit they can't actually track the results? The Attention Shift team debates the uncomfortable reality of "fuzzy" sports sponsorship ROI and the critical shift from passive visibility to active storytelling.

Summary

  • The £190 billion blind spot: The global sponsorship market is set to double by 2030, yet 76% of marketers admit they can’t reliably measure ROI—is this savvy brand building or just an expensive ego trip for CEOs?
  • “Red Bull is not a drink”: Why the energy giant succeeded by refusing to bring the product to the people, and instead built a media empire that forced the people to come to the product.
  • The “Lipstick Effect” in Rugby: Why Maybelline’s partnership with Ilona Maher proves that authentic, creator-led storytelling beats a passive logo on a bib—even if you can’t click “buy now” from the scrum.
  • The “Annoyance” Metric: As digital overlays clutter the pitch, are we finally admitting that some sponsorship is actively irritating fans, and should “frustration” be a KPI?
  • The billion-fan myth: How Spotify signed a massive deal with Barcelona only to discover a hollow database, and why cultural crossovers (like the Coldplay shirt) are the new currency of value.

Transcription

1
00:00:00.000 –> 00:00:03.400
Hello and welcome to this week’s edition of the Attention Shift podcast.

2
00:00:04.059 –> 00:00:08.039
Before we get into the pod, we need to talk about how the fan landscape is changing.

3
00:00:08.640 –> 00:00:13.120
According to the Financial Times, time spent on social media peaked back in 2022

4
00:00:13.120 –> 00:00:15.020
and has been falling ever since.

5
00:00:15.800 –> 00:00:19.560
But if social is in decline, how are you going to stay connected with your fans?

6
00:00:20.160 –> 00:00:23.320
That’s exactly why at Dizplai, we launched the Anonymous Fan Index.

7
00:00:23.600 –> 00:00:25.380
We brought together the leaders of sports business

8
00:00:25.380 –> 00:00:27.780
to identify the biggest gaps in fan understanding

9
00:00:27.780 –> 00:00:31.040
and a clear path for ensuring you stay connected to your audience.

10
00:00:34.610 –> 00:00:37.150
Welcome to the Attention Shift, a podcast where sports media

11
00:00:37.150 –> 00:00:40.930
gets debated like a VR decision, passionately longer than it should

12
00:00:40.930 –> 00:00:43.070
and with none of us fully agreeing on the outcome.

13
00:00:45.970 –> 00:00:47.510
Hello and welcome to the Attention Shift.

14
00:00:47.790 –> 00:00:49.650
I’m Ed Abis. I’m Jo Redfern.

15
00:00:50.110 –> 00:00:52.330
I’m Lee Rabourne. That’s a relief we’re all here.

16
00:00:53.250 –> 00:00:55.750
So today we’re going to talk about global sponsorship.

17
00:00:56.050 –> 00:00:58.870
So the global sports sponsored market projected to almost double

18
00:00:58.870 –> 00:01:05.129
from £97 billion in 2023 to £190 billion by 2030.

19
00:01:06.010 –> 00:01:08.150
Marketeers are pouring more into sponsorship than ever.

20
00:01:08.690 –> 00:01:13.430
But 76, not surprisingly, 76 percent say they can’t reliably measure ROI.

21
00:01:14.450 –> 00:01:17.870
That I call is exactly what smarter sponsorship ecosystems must bridge.

22
00:01:19.230 –> 00:01:22.010
So sports sponsors move beyond slapping sponsors on kit

23
00:01:22.010 –> 00:01:24.130
and having your brand shown on a billboard around the pitch,

24
00:01:24.150 –> 00:01:27.510
but not according to the measurements on ROI, as I mentioned earlier.

25
00:01:27.930 –> 00:01:30.710
And we’ve seen brands become content machines that integrate themselves

26
00:01:30.710 –> 00:01:33.590
directly into historic sporting moments through supplementary content.

27
00:01:33.870 –> 00:01:35.950
We’ll talk about Spotify as an example of that probably.

28
00:01:37.110 –> 00:01:39.410
The old model focused on passive logo placement,

29
00:01:39.450 –> 00:01:41.190
but we move beyond that, hopefully.

30
00:01:43.410 –> 00:01:45.330
So an example here, if we look at someone like Footers Island,

31
00:01:45.370 –> 00:01:48.130
for instance, they create content audiences want to see connecting

32
00:01:48.130 –> 00:01:50.750
with the audience they want to reach while showing off content supplies.

33
00:01:51.310 –> 00:01:53.710
And it’s a perfect example of how they’re using content investment

34
00:01:53.710 –> 00:01:55.190
to lead value and impact.

35
00:01:55.410 –> 00:01:57.010
And there’s lots of examples of that.

36
00:01:57.010 –> 00:01:59.630
A million examples of where that’s not being done properly.

37
00:02:01.670 –> 00:02:04.270
So, God, where do we kick off from there, then?

38
00:02:05.170 –> 00:02:07.190
I mean, let’s just let’s go for the headline.

39
00:02:07.210 –> 00:02:08.009
Do you want to go for the start?

40
00:02:08.610 –> 00:02:09.830
Let’s just go for the…

41
00:02:09.830 –> 00:02:11.850
Sorry, I laughed when I said it, but I was blown away about that.

42
00:02:11.890 –> 00:02:12.770
Was it 70?

43
00:02:14.270 –> 00:02:16.750
76 percent say they can’t reliably measure return

44
00:02:16.750 –> 00:02:18.710
investment for their sports sponsorships.

45
00:02:19.590 –> 00:02:23.450
I mean, well, it’s good to know we’re spending any money there, isn’t it?

46
00:02:23.530 –> 00:02:26.030
You know, if you can’t measure it, you know, why spend all your money?

47
00:02:26.030 –> 00:02:27.550
But interesting, Lloyd, like on that as well.

48
00:02:28.010 –> 00:02:30.770
Like, you know, we talked about this in a previous podcast as well.

49
00:02:31.170 –> 00:02:32.690
When we were leaders at sport the other week,

50
00:02:32.830 –> 00:02:34.990
there were a number of conversations that I had with people

51
00:02:34.990 –> 00:02:38.650
where people were saying that the sports sponsor is a real struggle at the moment.

52
00:02:39.110 –> 00:02:43.070
So I’m just trying to understand how that is being

53
00:02:43.070 –> 00:02:46.070
how it’s being projected to almost double in the next several.

54
00:02:47.090 –> 00:02:49.950
Yeah, I’m glad you don’t understand it, because who someone

55
00:02:49.950 –> 00:02:52.450
as someone who’s relatively new to the world of sport,

56
00:02:52.750 –> 00:02:55.510
it completely befuddles my brain.

57
00:02:56.030 –> 00:02:58.090
That 76 percent are saying

58
00:02:58.090 –> 00:03:02.150
they find it hard to calculate ROI, this fuzzy ROI.

59
00:03:02.410 –> 00:03:03.690
I imagine they say it anonymously.

60
00:03:04.870 –> 00:03:06.790
Yeah, they plan to increase it.

61
00:03:07.310 –> 00:03:09.670
What? That’s bad business.

62
00:03:10.690 –> 00:03:16.250
I mean, it look, I think there’s a there is some brand loyalty, right?

63
00:03:16.350 –> 00:03:20.710
I think there is, you know, if you fans do, whether rightly or wrongly,

64
00:03:21.110 –> 00:03:25.090
they do generally expect to say that if an athlete wears something

65
00:03:25.090 –> 00:03:27.910
or recommends it or an influencer wears something,

66
00:03:28.590 –> 00:03:30.790
then I think that’s plus that women’s sports sponsorship.

67
00:03:31.030 –> 00:03:34.670
You know, there’s a women’s sports fans were two times more likely

68
00:03:34.670 –> 00:03:38.690
to purchase a recommended product, for example, from a female athlete.

69
00:03:39.090 –> 00:03:41.910
So there are things that colloquially, if you like,

70
00:03:43.050 –> 00:03:45.210
people are saying that they that you’re saying it.

71
00:03:45.550 –> 00:03:47.470
But the fact, I mean, maybe they don’t publish this.

72
00:03:47.670 –> 00:03:48.390
I mean, some of this.

73
00:03:48.550 –> 00:03:50.770
But you think if if no one can measure it,

74
00:03:51.490 –> 00:03:55.310
as if you could measure it, you should be shouting it from the rooftops

75
00:03:55.310 –> 00:03:56.050
right now, right?

76
00:03:56.050 –> 00:03:58.250
And I think we’ve talked about this in the past before.

77
00:03:58.410 –> 00:04:01.990
Like you just said, that sponsors expect more in terms of, you know,

78
00:04:01.990 –> 00:04:06.110
I just you know, that your logo was seen a hundred times in the last hour

79
00:04:06.110 –> 00:04:08.970
because because it was on the show or because it wasn’t things.

80
00:04:08.990 –> 00:04:11.450
You know, we talked about it when we were talking about data

81
00:04:11.450 –> 00:04:14.250
and the fact that if you could understand your fan, you’re into that data,

82
00:04:14.290 –> 00:04:17.850
you can do much more targeted advertising and also choose your sponsors.

83
00:04:17.890 –> 00:04:20.110
We’ve done it from a club’s clubs perspective.

84
00:04:20.769 –> 00:04:22.050
But from a sponsor’s perspective,

85
00:04:23.210 –> 00:04:27.230
yeah, I just it is baffling that there’s all this money it’s going in.

86
00:04:27.770 –> 00:04:31.150
And some of it, I feel, is a bit because the CEO wants to brag about

87
00:04:31.150 –> 00:04:34.370
or get some free tickets to, you know, the F1 maybe.

88
00:04:34.550 –> 00:04:35.990
I imagine that happens quite a lot.

89
00:04:36.070 –> 00:04:36.970
Does that still happen though?

90
00:04:36.970 –> 00:04:37.870
I think it does.

91
00:04:39.130 –> 00:04:39.970
I think I think it does.

92
00:04:40.070 –> 00:04:41.150
Or don’t you take your clients?

93
00:04:41.290 –> 00:04:45.430
You know, it used to be like it used to be back in my early IT career.

94
00:04:45.930 –> 00:04:48.630
It’s like, you know, you sponsor like a rugby box at the rugby

95
00:04:49.150 –> 00:04:52.010
and you take you take clients out and you have a few beers.

96
00:04:52.050 –> 00:04:53.870
And that’s that’s where the deal would get done.

97
00:04:53.890 –> 00:04:58.050
So there was more of a closing side rather than sort of a fan buying.

98
00:04:58.130 –> 00:04:59.970
But I think from a direct consumer point of view,

99
00:05:00.470 –> 00:05:03.050
it’s crazy that in this day and age that we still

100
00:05:03.050 –> 00:05:04.970
there is still no one going out there.

101
00:05:05.170 –> 00:05:07.070
You know, some of the stats are trying to pull out again.

102
00:05:07.130 –> 00:05:09.710
It’s like, you know, what does a good campaign look like?

103
00:05:09.730 –> 00:05:11.830
Well, it should be two to one or I was like, well,

104
00:05:11.830 –> 00:05:13.690
if you can’t measure the ROI, how do you know

105
00:05:13.690 –> 00:05:16.190
you’re getting two to one ROI on this?

106
00:05:16.190 –> 00:05:20.750
I mean, what would you say has been a good ad?

107
00:05:21.150 –> 00:05:22.190
Let’s flip it up, right?

108
00:05:22.230 –> 00:05:23.130
Just get us into this.

109
00:05:23.550 –> 00:05:25.990
What would you say has been a good ad that’s made you buy something?

110
00:05:26.910 –> 00:05:28.970
It could be anywhere, like an Instagram.

111
00:05:29.150 –> 00:05:31.030
It could be anything like what is, you know, what sort of

112
00:05:31.030 –> 00:05:32.390
how does that content look like?

113
00:05:32.650 –> 00:05:33.490
And how has it got you?

114
00:05:33.590 –> 00:05:36.530
And do you go because my wife gets it’s not so responsive related then.

115
00:05:36.690 –> 00:05:38.890
No, because my wife gets Instagram shopped all the time.

116
00:05:38.950 –> 00:05:41.230
She’ll watch a video, for example, and she goes away

117
00:05:41.230 –> 00:05:43.910
and she’ll go, well, you know, it’s about some new makeup thing.

118
00:05:43.910 –> 00:05:47.610
That is basically, in essence, is a sponsored activation

119
00:05:47.610 –> 00:05:49.650
that generally is working really well.

120
00:05:49.950 –> 00:05:53.410
And if we take that as a good example, then let’s try and work

121
00:05:53.410 –> 00:05:57.170
that back to sports and if sports doing the same the same thing.

122
00:05:58.330 –> 00:06:01.190
I’m going to I’m going to answer your question with a sports example

123
00:06:01.190 –> 00:06:05.650
only because it’s something that I’ve seen on my TikTok today.

124
00:06:05.650 –> 00:06:07.090
And so it’s fresh in my mind.

125
00:06:07.390 –> 00:06:11.410
But in a way, it’s an example of what I think is a relatively

126
00:06:12.670 –> 00:06:15.970
it it makes it makes sense as a sports sponsorship.

127
00:06:16.610 –> 00:06:20.890
And it’s Maybelline sponsored the sister of Ilona Mayer

128
00:06:20.890 –> 00:06:23.150
because Olivia Mayer, because she’s cheaper.

129
00:06:23.770 –> 00:06:28.290
I mean, the three the three of them have the House of Mire.

130
00:06:28.290 –> 00:06:29.290
I was just being flippant.

131
00:06:29.290 –> 00:06:31.730
I don’t really know. I imagine probably cheaper.

132
00:06:32.030 –> 00:06:36.010
Yes. And they sponsored her to run the New York Marathon.

133
00:06:36.070 –> 00:06:40.790
Well, of course, Ilona turns up to cheer on her sister.

134
00:06:40.790 –> 00:06:44.810
So I imagine it’s probably the whole they’ve sponsored the three of them.

135
00:06:45.510 –> 00:06:48.430
Holding up signs, cheering on Livvy.

136
00:06:48.650 –> 00:06:50.190
It’s got Maybelline branding.

137
00:06:50.530 –> 00:06:53.610
I mean, you know, Ilona Mayer is famous for her red lippy

138
00:06:53.610 –> 00:06:54.910
when she’s out training.

139
00:06:55.510 –> 00:07:00.530
That to me felt quite, you know, natural, engaging.

140
00:07:01.370 –> 00:07:04.850
She’s you see that her run out on the field with red lipstick.

141
00:07:05.030 –> 00:07:07.990
She likes to get glammed up, even though she is, you know, very

142
00:07:08.510 –> 00:07:11.830
kind of body positive and talks about how beautiful her strength is.

143
00:07:12.070 –> 00:07:14.370
Her sister’s too, really engaging.

144
00:07:14.830 –> 00:07:17.430
So that for me was marathon running.

145
00:07:18.130 –> 00:07:20.490
She’s been training for it for a while.

146
00:07:22.850 –> 00:07:26.590
Maybelline nicely, sensitively, but kind of authentically

147
00:07:26.590 –> 00:07:28.350
embedded in that piece of content.

148
00:07:28.530 –> 00:07:32.150
So that struck me this morning as being something that didn’t feel

149
00:07:32.150 –> 00:07:34.570
too forced, too salesy, pretty good.

150
00:07:34.710 –> 00:07:35.710
You’re like, she’s run a marathon.

151
00:07:35.710 –> 00:07:37.010
So they’ve got the same tagline.

152
00:07:37.030 –> 00:07:38.650
Maybe she’s born with it. Maybe it’s Maybelline.

153
00:07:38.770 –> 00:07:42.210
No, no, no, no, not that I saw, but I just thought that

154
00:07:42.210 –> 00:07:45.930
that was a really good example of how they used somebody in sport.

155
00:07:46.010 –> 00:07:47.210
So interesting like that.

156
00:07:47.850 –> 00:07:49.630
But how would you measure ROI on that?

157
00:07:49.810 –> 00:07:52.690
The way you but you have like you have answered

158
00:07:52.690 –> 00:07:54.830
ultimately the sports sponsored question on that, right?

159
00:07:55.170 –> 00:07:57.530
Because you were just asking about a brand that actually you’ve

160
00:07:57.530 –> 00:07:59.870
gone and found it because it is you could always a sports sponsor

161
00:07:59.870 –> 00:08:01.150
just in a different kind of way.

162
00:08:01.550 –> 00:08:03.910
Yeah. But how would you one?

163
00:08:03.910 –> 00:08:05.870
How would you measure ROI on that?

164
00:08:06.050 –> 00:08:07.050
Well, again, I don’t know.

165
00:08:07.170 –> 00:08:09.670
I’m not a sponsorship expert and I am slightly

166
00:08:09.670 –> 00:08:11.590
fuzzy myself on how it works in sport.

167
00:08:11.690 –> 00:08:15.970
If she was wearing a QR code on her bib that says you’ve got like

168
00:08:15.970 –> 00:08:17.210
sponsor and don’t meet me now.

169
00:08:17.710 –> 00:08:19.270
Well, let’s assume she wasn’t doing that though.

170
00:08:19.310 –> 00:08:22.170
How do you measure it in terms of because there’s an obvious way

171
00:08:22.170 –> 00:08:25.530
they’ll go, they’ll go, look, if I was going to do ads on Insta,

172
00:08:25.650 –> 00:08:26.830
it would cost me X.

173
00:08:26.830 –> 00:08:30.690
Yeah. I got that much reach engagement on Insta with this.

174
00:08:30.730 –> 00:08:31.650
It was Y.

175
00:08:31.730 –> 00:08:33.090
And they’ll probably go, that was too time.

176
00:08:33.090 –> 00:08:34.429
What it would have cost me if I’d done it normally.

177
00:08:34.730 –> 00:08:36.010
That’ll be the simple way they’ll do it.

178
00:08:36.429 –> 00:08:39.690
It would be difficult for them to do any direct association

179
00:08:39.690 –> 00:08:43.870
or commercial uplift because you’re not necessarily going direct

180
00:08:43.870 –> 00:08:44.570
to buy from Maybelline.

181
00:08:44.750 –> 00:08:45.890
Well, that’s the thing, isn’t it?

182
00:08:45.950 –> 00:08:47.930
Yeah. I mean, I can you buy from Maybelline direct

183
00:08:47.930 –> 00:08:49.510
or do you actually do the other stuff?

184
00:08:49.610 –> 00:08:53.030
But the thing is, that might have increased my consideration

185
00:08:53.030 –> 00:08:55.770
the next time I’m thinking about buying a lippy, but not now.

186
00:08:55.850 –> 00:08:58.090
I didn’t press buy now on watching it.

187
00:08:58.190 –> 00:09:02.150
Something like 15 touch points with a brand before you you consider buying.

188
00:09:02.150 –> 00:09:03.390
So you’ll have sold it to Maybelline.

189
00:09:06.190 –> 00:09:07.870
He’s just kept it front of mind.

190
00:09:08.270 –> 00:09:11.330
Yeah. But I think that’s the problem is that, you know,

191
00:09:11.330 –> 00:09:14.670
you used to be able to get away with saying, you know, your brand was,

192
00:09:14.670 –> 00:09:19.850
you know, it’s 15 touch points or your logo was seeing X amount of times

193
00:09:19.850 –> 00:09:22.830
in the space of an hour and they were joking about the sponsorship costs

194
00:09:22.830 –> 00:09:25.890
and, you know, sponsoring an F1 car early.

195
00:09:26.090 –> 00:09:27.530
And like how much value does that do?

196
00:09:27.610 –> 00:09:30.970
Or actually, like in my teensy man United, as I’ve said many times,

197
00:09:30.970 –> 00:09:35.090
how many people who support watch man United play our team viewer buyers?

198
00:09:35.390 –> 00:09:36.470
You know, who’s going to buy?

199
00:09:36.990 –> 00:09:39.190
Who’s going to go out there and buy a team viewer based on that?

200
00:09:39.190 –> 00:09:39.990
You know, it’s a very niche.

201
00:09:39.990 –> 00:09:42.430
Also, it’s the same with Atlassian sponsoring Williams F1,

202
00:09:42.550 –> 00:09:43.730
which is Atlassian’s Gira, right?

203
00:09:44.330 –> 00:09:46.470
So what is that Atlassian owned Gira?

204
00:09:46.490 –> 00:09:51.390
Gira is a project management software used for software engineering.

205
00:09:52.350 –> 00:09:54.870
I don’t know, like all the people who are buying that

206
00:09:54.870 –> 00:09:57.650
are sort of connected into F1 or actually are they using it,

207
00:09:57.730 –> 00:10:00.030
like you said, to take lots of people into hospitality,

208
00:10:00.510 –> 00:10:02.910
experiences, but I honestly don’t know what they’re doing,

209
00:10:02.970 –> 00:10:04.790
but it’s a similar kind of thing as team viewer.

210
00:10:07.430 –> 00:10:08.530
Yeah, and that was the issue.

211
00:10:08.590 –> 00:10:10.610
I think that was the issue, you know, with the team view.

212
00:10:10.730 –> 00:10:14.670
I think ultimately the CEO got called out on the, you know,

213
00:10:14.710 –> 00:10:16.770
the sort of team viewer sponsorship for man United.

214
00:10:17.010 –> 00:10:19.670
So they spent a lot of money and the company was losing.

215
00:10:19.790 –> 00:10:21.410
Yeah. And actually it was bad.

216
00:10:21.450 –> 00:10:25.170
It was a bad, arguably a bad deal because it’s, you know, marketing.

217
00:10:25.250 –> 00:10:27.190
So there is bad examples of bad deals.

218
00:10:27.190 –> 00:10:30.130
I was trying in preparation for this.

219
00:10:30.930 –> 00:10:32.770
I know I was trying, I know, and that’s the thing I was trying.

220
00:10:32.850 –> 00:10:34.990
I think this is probably a nice segue into the Spotify stuff

221
00:10:34.990 –> 00:10:39.030
because it’s probably the only deal I was trying to look, do some research

222
00:10:40.010 –> 00:10:42.550
into who’s got the biggest sort of ROI in history.

223
00:10:42.730 –> 00:10:46.390
And it’s like, again, no one advertises, no one says that there’s advertising.

224
00:10:47.350 –> 00:10:50.590
You know, again, they reference things like NASCAR, you know, obviously,

225
00:10:50.630 –> 00:10:54.610
you know, you get good, again, publicly information is not done.

226
00:10:55.130 –> 00:10:58.270
The only one I could find was around women’s sports stats, you know,

227
00:10:58.350 –> 00:11:00.450
which was people likely to buy.

228
00:11:00.610 –> 00:11:04.110
And that’s just people and fans and fans says they saying 2.8

229
00:11:04.110 –> 00:11:08.370
times more likely to buy that doesn’t tell you actual sales, sales revenue.

230
00:11:08.430 –> 00:11:13.830
And I think. You know, it is, it depends on how you look at sponsorship,

231
00:11:13.830 –> 00:11:16.890
I think, and I think if we’re just talking about the sponsorship

232
00:11:16.890 –> 00:11:21.390
to give you a direct increase in sales or marketing,

233
00:11:21.530 –> 00:11:22.750
generally is quite a hard thing.

234
00:11:22.750 –> 00:11:24.210
Or do you would you put this?

235
00:11:24.410 –> 00:11:26.430
Are you putting this sponsorship into question?

236
00:11:26.590 –> 00:11:27.590
What is the ROI?

237
00:11:27.890 –> 00:11:28.750
Are we at me?

238
00:11:28.870 –> 00:11:31.370
And has it typically been valued in just sales uplift?

239
00:11:31.670 –> 00:11:34.810
Because is there may be value in sponsorship that isn’t

240
00:11:34.810 –> 00:11:37.090
such a hard metric? Yeah.

241
00:11:37.250 –> 00:11:39.110
I think it’d be difficult to argue that sports

242
00:11:39.110 –> 00:11:40.690
sponsorships not worked for Red Bull.

243
00:11:40.990 –> 00:11:43.230
No. Yeah. And they didn’t start out.

244
00:11:43.350 –> 00:11:45.910
Well, I guess how long have you been doing F1 now, Red Bull?

245
00:11:45.990 –> 00:11:47.950
Oh, God, I’m going to ask Cameron and Mark.

246
00:11:48.550 –> 00:11:48.810
Long time, though.

247
00:11:48.810 –> 00:11:50.330
But then that would imply

248
00:11:50.330 –> 00:11:53.030
that would imply something that you can’t speed run.

249
00:11:53.190 –> 00:11:54.890
Then you’ve got to invest over the long term.

250
00:11:54.910 –> 00:11:56.910
But what I was going to say is, but yes and no,

251
00:11:57.010 –> 00:11:59.450
because what I think what they have done is and obviously more likely

252
00:11:59.450 –> 00:12:03.490
now they’re coming to football in Leipzig and Leeds now as well.

253
00:12:03.570 –> 00:12:05.530
But they started out, they did.

254
00:12:06.350 –> 00:12:09.150
They created the Red Bull media house in 2007.

255
00:12:09.150 –> 00:12:10.090
It’s the extreme sports.

256
00:12:10.430 –> 00:12:11.990
They started an extreme sports, even before extreme sports,

257
00:12:12.090 –> 00:12:12.790
they did the salt box.

258
00:12:13.090 –> 00:12:14.270
Yeah. They did the airplanes.

259
00:12:14.470 –> 00:12:17.250
I think they now subsequently sold the airplane race business.

260
00:12:18.010 –> 00:12:18.870
Red Bull Air Race.

261
00:12:18.870 –> 00:12:19.610
The X Games.

262
00:12:20.530 –> 00:12:24.350
I sat there watching the soapbox stuff on some random channel.

263
00:12:24.690 –> 00:12:26.650
And it’s never, never not funny.

264
00:12:27.130 –> 00:12:28.330
Yeah. And they do it all over the world.

265
00:12:28.370 –> 00:12:30.330
So they start out doing a lot of the sponsorships like that

266
00:12:30.330 –> 00:12:33.970
and stuff that people didn’t really didn’t have a market.

267
00:12:34.230 –> 00:12:36.190
We didn’t really care about in the same kind of way.

268
00:12:36.250 –> 00:12:38.390
And then I think they cut their teeth doing those kind of things

269
00:12:38.390 –> 00:12:41.570
and realized how sponsorship worked to really, again,

270
00:12:42.030 –> 00:12:44.210
create an experience, really sort of embed themselves

271
00:12:44.210 –> 00:12:45.910
within cultural experiences.

272
00:12:46.410 –> 00:12:47.870
Then they started like, obviously, they were already

273
00:12:47.870 –> 00:12:50.250
I think they were already doing the F1 at that point,

274
00:12:50.410 –> 00:12:51.690
but then they started coming to other stuff too.

275
00:12:51.690 –> 00:12:53.150
And I think they’ve used those things.

276
00:12:53.270 –> 00:12:55.570
I said, they went to extreme sports to really mature.

277
00:12:55.890 –> 00:12:57.530
How will they activate sponsorships?

278
00:12:57.530 –> 00:12:58.350
It’s interesting, actually.

279
00:12:58.670 –> 00:12:58.970
Now, yes.

280
00:12:59.050 –> 00:13:00.670
You don’t see a lot of advertising anymore.

281
00:13:01.070 –> 00:13:02.650
I’m going to just before you say, I’m going to jump in,

282
00:13:03.210 –> 00:13:05.310
because producer Will has just sent a really interesting quote

283
00:13:05.310 –> 00:13:06.830
from the Red Bull co-founder.

284
00:13:07.150 –> 00:13:08.570
We do not bring the product to the people.

285
00:13:08.690 –> 00:13:10.110
We bring people to the product.

286
00:13:10.530 –> 00:13:12.910
We make it available to those who love our style

287
00:13:12.910 –> 00:13:15.050
and they come to us. Red Bull is not a drink.

288
00:13:15.110 –> 00:13:15.710
It’s a way of life.

289
00:13:15.970 –> 00:13:16.970
And that’s it.

290
00:13:16.970 –> 00:13:18.810
I mean, I only ever have it with vodka.

291
00:13:20.090 –> 00:13:21.070
That’s your way of life.

292
00:13:21.090 –> 00:13:22.570
So that’s a funny thing.

293
00:13:22.610 –> 00:13:23.310
It’s a rare thing.

294
00:13:23.390 –> 00:13:25.550
I knew someone who worked for Red Bull and they said,

295
00:13:25.750 –> 00:13:27.290
do you are not allowed, if you work for Red Bull,

296
00:13:27.330 –> 00:13:28.690
you are not allowed to mention vodka.

297
00:13:28.930 –> 00:13:29.130
Really?

298
00:13:29.770 –> 00:13:32.370
Yeah, they just didn’t want the brand association.

299
00:13:32.850 –> 00:13:33.950
30 years ago, vodka Red Bull.

300
00:13:34.270 –> 00:13:35.890
But I think they did kind of do that.

301
00:13:35.990 –> 00:13:38.110
And I think there was other things they were doing around,

302
00:13:38.270 –> 00:13:39.930
which is like, you know, sort of like leaving,

303
00:13:39.990 –> 00:13:41.430
you know, they’re going to universities.

304
00:13:41.710 –> 00:13:43.710
It’s kind of unrelated once a bit about the brand,

305
00:13:43.810 –> 00:13:45.350
which was they were leaving empty cans everywhere.

306
00:13:45.350 –> 00:13:47.230
Oh, they used to do it outside nightclubs and bins.

307
00:13:47.770 –> 00:13:48.370
To make it to make a little drink.

308
00:13:48.410 –> 00:13:49.530
But I think what’s interesting,

309
00:13:49.610 –> 00:13:51.070
and if you take Red Bull example, right,

310
00:13:51.090 –> 00:13:54.090
before Red Bull, the energy drink market was probably,

311
00:13:54.230 –> 00:13:55.970
what, Gatorade and Lucasade, right?

312
00:13:55.970 –> 00:13:58.370
And it was very much a standard, especially in the US.

313
00:13:58.410 –> 00:13:59.810
It was about performance, wasn’t it?

314
00:13:59.810 –> 00:14:01.650
It was all about performance and its things.

315
00:14:02.010 –> 00:14:04.590
And they really, so yeah, maybe the narrative there is,

316
00:14:04.930 –> 00:14:07.790
does it help your storytelling for your brand?

317
00:14:07.790 –> 00:14:10.470
And if you’re trying to create a presence and get known,

318
00:14:10.870 –> 00:14:12.810
it’s the same way you’d probably go over creator now,

319
00:14:12.970 –> 00:14:13.910
the creator partnership.

320
00:14:13.910 –> 00:14:16.970
They were really early to that storytelling

321
00:14:17.470 –> 00:14:19.950
as a way to embed sponsorships properly,

322
00:14:20.010 –> 00:14:20.230
weren’t they?

323
00:14:20.530 –> 00:14:21.830
With the creation of Red Bull Media House.

324
00:14:21.830 –> 00:14:23.690
Which is quite hard to measure the ROI

325
00:14:23.690 –> 00:14:25.710
apart from your year on year sales, right?

326
00:14:26.050 –> 00:14:27.610
Which is why I asked the question, you know,

327
00:14:27.610 –> 00:14:31.130
if the ROI is limited to just sales uplift,

328
00:14:31.550 –> 00:14:35.170
are we losing that value that is derived elsewhere?

329
00:14:35.430 –> 00:14:36.710
Which might be harder to track,

330
00:14:36.730 –> 00:14:38.850
but actually does compound over time.

331
00:14:39.050 –> 00:14:40.650
If we’re using Red Bull as an example,

332
00:14:40.690 –> 00:14:42.490
you would say, yes, it does compound over time.

333
00:14:42.490 –> 00:14:44.310
Because look at where they are now,

334
00:14:44.830 –> 00:14:47.330
nearly 20 years after they set up Red Bull Media.

335
00:14:48.710 –> 00:14:49.850
Also, they’ll be arguing as well

336
00:14:49.850 –> 00:14:51.910
that all of that compounding over time,

337
00:14:52.230 –> 00:14:53.810
what is the value of the business in itself?

338
00:14:54.150 –> 00:14:56.990
So the size of the sales, what is the business worth?

339
00:14:57.170 –> 00:14:58.410
I guess it depends on your objectives

340
00:14:59.790 –> 00:15:01.370
for a sponsorship, right?

341
00:15:01.370 –> 00:15:05.350
If you’re doing a small, limited run

342
00:15:05.350 –> 00:15:06.910
for either a one-off event,

343
00:15:07.050 –> 00:15:08.830
or you’re just doing like a drop of something,

344
00:15:08.830 –> 00:15:09.870
you know, like you’re just pop up

345
00:15:09.870 –> 00:15:10.850
and you’re trying to do a match,

346
00:15:10.850 –> 00:15:13.030
then you need, I would argue

347
00:15:13.030 –> 00:15:15.450
that you need some way of digitally tracking that,

348
00:15:15.450 –> 00:15:17.750
whether it’s a QR code or some activation or-

349
00:15:17.750 –> 00:15:19.050
I guess when they started doing it,

350
00:15:19.090 –> 00:15:20.030
those things didn’t exist.

351
00:15:20.250 –> 00:15:21.830
No, but I’m saying if you’re doing it now,

352
00:15:21.990 –> 00:15:24.790
you’d want some, you’d want hard metrics to prove

353
00:15:24.790 –> 00:15:26.950
that you’re getting the engagement that you want.

354
00:15:27.150 –> 00:15:28.250
You drove the sales.

355
00:15:28.450 –> 00:15:30.090
And, you know, if I was a sponsor trying to sponsor,

356
00:15:30.470 –> 00:15:33.390
let’s say it was the boat race, you know,

357
00:15:33.530 –> 00:15:34.110
Oxford, Cambridge program.

358
00:15:34.190 –> 00:15:36.970
Say you’re trying, I want to be a sponsor for that.

359
00:15:37.090 –> 00:15:38.630
It’s one-off event once a year.

360
00:15:38.670 –> 00:15:40.070
I want to see my ROI.

361
00:15:40.070 –> 00:15:42.610
The way I’m going to track that is by some promo code,

362
00:15:42.710 –> 00:15:44.390
some QR code, some digital initiative

363
00:15:44.390 –> 00:15:47.350
that I can actually prove that I got some return

364
00:15:47.350 –> 00:15:47.950
or investment out.

365
00:15:48.370 –> 00:15:50.410
If you’re looking at like a sports front

366
00:15:50.410 –> 00:15:52.070
and share sponsor, you know,

367
00:15:52.070 –> 00:15:52.870
I think it’s probably a nice way

368
00:15:52.870 –> 00:15:54.370
to segue into the Spotify one.

369
00:15:54.470 –> 00:15:56.090
You know, when we’ve talked about this before,

370
00:15:56.350 –> 00:15:59.410
about when Spotify did the deal with Barcelona

371
00:15:59.410 –> 00:16:01.270
and Barcelona went, we’ve got a billion fans

372
00:16:01.270 –> 00:16:02.730
and Spotify went, show us.

373
00:16:02.770 –> 00:16:03.950
And they went, oh no,

374
00:16:04.030 –> 00:16:05.870
we’ve only got 300,000 fans in our database

375
00:16:05.870 –> 00:16:09.350
and the deal was done for 307 million dollars.

376
00:16:09.350 –> 00:16:10.950
And now they’ve just renewed it, right?

377
00:16:11.010 –> 00:16:12.610
They’ve just renewed it recently.

378
00:16:12.770 –> 00:16:16.970
It’s gone up 64%, so 460 million dollars,

379
00:16:17.050 –> 00:16:18.310
I think, top of my head.

380
00:16:18.510 –> 00:16:19.470
Actually without checking my stats,

381
00:16:19.490 –> 00:16:20.090
that’s quite impressive.

382
00:16:21.610 –> 00:16:23.150
But I know their stadium isn’t finished.

383
00:16:23.250 –> 00:16:24.710
The team’s been in a bit of a flux,

384
00:16:24.870 –> 00:16:27.590
you could argue, in recent years.

385
00:16:27.950 –> 00:16:29.510
But when you look at what they’ve done

386
00:16:29.510 –> 00:16:31.050
in terms of building, you know,

387
00:16:31.050 –> 00:16:32.490
we take the Red Bull example

388
00:16:32.930 –> 00:16:36.230
of building cultural moments around the different,

389
00:16:36.230 –> 00:16:38.610
you know, the Coldplay shirts or the Ed Sheeran shirt

390
00:16:38.610 –> 00:16:41.030
or the Drake shirt and all the collaborations

391
00:16:41.030 –> 00:16:42.870
that they’re doing with these artists.

392
00:16:43.450 –> 00:16:45.490
That’s not, you know, apart from the direct merch,

393
00:16:45.590 –> 00:16:47.350
which you’ll get, you know, for buying a,

394
00:16:47.350 –> 00:16:50.270
you know, a Coldplay shirt, sponsored shirt,

395
00:16:50.730 –> 00:16:52.870
there is, it’s about creating that brand storytelling,

396
00:16:52.970 –> 00:16:54.370
a brand and things like that.

397
00:16:54.370 –> 00:16:55.790
And that’s a longer term deal than,

398
00:16:55.970 –> 00:16:57.390
that’s a 10 year deal

399
00:16:57.390 –> 00:16:59.510
where you can have that longer view on it.

400
00:16:59.690 –> 00:17:03.950
So maybe there is the incremental measurement on that

401
00:17:03.950 –> 00:17:06.369
is reach ultimate subscribers,

402
00:17:06.369 –> 00:17:08.609
but you will see it in the merch sales

403
00:17:08.609 –> 00:17:10.710
that you’ll get in the spiking for those.

404
00:17:12.369 –> 00:17:15.230
And in terms of, is it,

405
00:17:15.390 –> 00:17:16.970
the other thing that I wanna pick up on it

406
00:17:16.970 –> 00:17:19.030
is you just said, it depends on your objectives.

407
00:17:19.410 –> 00:17:22.170
I do wonder as well, if for some sponsors,

408
00:17:22.490 –> 00:17:23.910
it’s also a defense,

409
00:17:24.430 –> 00:17:26.290
because if they are sponsoring,

410
00:17:26.650 –> 00:17:28.710
it means that their competitors can’t.

411
00:17:28.710 –> 00:17:31.110
And I do wonder if some of them that have been

412
00:17:31.110 –> 00:17:34.830
a sponsor for a certain team or race for a long time,

413
00:17:34.830 –> 00:17:36.450
they’re almost locked in,

414
00:17:36.450 –> 00:17:37.790
because the moment they move out,

415
00:17:37.830 –> 00:17:39.810
one of their competitors is then front and center.

416
00:17:40.010 –> 00:17:44.710
So in a way, you know, it’s a defense mechanism as well.

417
00:17:45.250 –> 00:17:47.490
I think that’s a good segue into Hot Take Huddle

418
00:17:47.490 –> 00:17:48.910
because you two are doing it.

419
00:17:49.030 –> 00:17:50.990
Oh no, no.

420
00:17:51.970 –> 00:17:54.010
Right then, so we’re back for the Hot Take Huddle

421
00:17:54.010 –> 00:17:55.610
and I’m not in the hot suite,

422
00:17:56.090 –> 00:17:57.870
hot suite, hot seat this week.

423
00:17:57.870 –> 00:17:59.390
So I’m delighted.

424
00:18:00.210 –> 00:18:02.450
So the question is,

425
00:18:02.450 –> 00:18:05.910
is a sponsor better creating a new league or game,

426
00:18:06.230 –> 00:18:08.830
or are they better off sponsoring a sporting property,

427
00:18:08.910 –> 00:18:10.430
i.e. if they own,

428
00:18:10.510 –> 00:18:11.870
if they create something and own it themselves,

429
00:18:11.930 –> 00:18:13.570
do you think they’ll get more value

430
00:18:13.570 –> 00:18:16.530
than if they are sponsoring something that already exists?

431
00:18:16.790 –> 00:18:20.870
So who’s gonna go for creating a new league or game?

432
00:18:20.970 –> 00:18:22.210
You mean Joe Bloks in the corner?

433
00:18:22.890 –> 00:18:28.110
Joe Bloks, which means you’re living by the status quo.

434
00:18:29.350 –> 00:18:30.990
Right then, so who wants to go first?

435
00:18:31.570 –> 00:18:32.850
Go on, I’ll go, I’ll go.

436
00:18:32.930 –> 00:18:33.830
All right, Lee’s gonna go first.

437
00:18:33.870 –> 00:18:34.550
He’s gonna try now.

438
00:18:34.730 –> 00:18:35.610
I’m gonna try, I’m gonna try.

439
00:18:36.250 –> 00:18:36.950
It’s a hard one to write.

440
00:18:37.290 –> 00:18:38.470
Well, 30 seconds on the clock.

441
00:18:39.330 –> 00:18:40.870
And away we go.

442
00:18:41.510 –> 00:18:43.050
I think you’re better off

443
00:18:43.050 –> 00:18:46.830
going for an existing league or federation or game

444
00:18:47.870 –> 00:18:49.370
because if you’ve got,

445
00:18:49.670 –> 00:18:51.230
in essence, you’ve got guaranteed reach.

446
00:18:51.310 –> 00:18:52.690
If you’re going for something like the Premier League,

447
00:18:52.750 –> 00:18:53.870
you’ve got guaranteed audiences

448
00:18:53.870 –> 00:18:56.230
or like the World Cup, you’re guaranteed to see that.

449
00:18:56.610 –> 00:18:58.370
Also, you can create the best thing in the world

450
00:18:58.370 –> 00:18:59.430
and no one ever sees it.

451
00:18:59.430 –> 00:19:01.190
There’s so many great examples of technology

452
00:19:01.190 –> 00:19:02.990
that’s been done or seen

453
00:19:02.990 –> 00:19:04.890
and it’s not a guaranteed audience.

454
00:19:05.050 –> 00:19:07.070
You know, whilst you might get better ownership,

455
00:19:07.630 –> 00:19:09.110
you’re not guaranteed the reach.

456
00:19:09.370 –> 00:19:11.290
So your exposure is better off for that.

457
00:19:12.890 –> 00:19:13.330
Okay.

458
00:19:14.150 –> 00:19:14.310
Well done.

459
00:19:14.410 –> 00:19:17.050
Will’s alarm’s so angry, he scares me.

460
00:19:17.370 –> 00:19:18.550
You did a lot better than I did last time.

461
00:19:19.510 –> 00:19:21.270
30 seconds is not long, is it?

462
00:19:22.110 –> 00:19:24.090
It is when you don’t know what to say.

463
00:19:25.350 –> 00:19:26.150
For a change yet, yeah?

464
00:19:26.150 –> 00:19:29.870
Rather than joke, you’re creating a new league or game.

465
00:19:30.930 –> 00:19:33.010
30 seconds on the clock, starting now.

466
00:19:33.730 –> 00:19:34.010
Okay.

467
00:19:34.710 –> 00:19:37.270
My thesis is that that sponsorship money

468
00:19:37.270 –> 00:19:39.790
would be far better invested

469
00:19:39.790 –> 00:19:41.550
in creating a new type of game.

470
00:19:42.350 –> 00:19:43.950
For example, let’s think about Dove.

471
00:19:44.450 –> 00:19:46.850
So if Dove created a new,

472
00:19:46.990 –> 00:19:48.690
a board league version of Netball, for example,

473
00:19:48.890 –> 00:19:50.310
they get to own the IP.

474
00:19:50.630 –> 00:19:53.870
They can scale and monetize the IP however they want.

475
00:19:53.930 –> 00:19:55.370
They don’t need to rent the eyeballs

476
00:19:55.370 –> 00:19:58.710
from somebody watching someone else’s team or league.

477
00:19:59.030 –> 00:20:00.910
And then they get to own all of that data.

478
00:20:00.910 –> 00:20:02.590
That will inform their own products.

479
00:20:02.810 –> 00:20:05.810
But it also means that they have a much closer relationship

480
00:20:05.810 –> 00:20:07.070
with their consumers.

481
00:20:11.670 –> 00:20:12.450
I’m going to give that to Jo.

482
00:20:12.650 –> 00:20:13.590
I think you should, yeah.

483
00:20:13.970 –> 00:20:14.310
I agree with Jo.

484
00:20:14.310 –> 00:20:14.910
Just to be clear,

485
00:20:15.090 –> 00:20:16.490
whilst she looked like she was looking at her screen,

486
00:20:16.530 –> 00:20:17.770
she’d not written anything there.

487
00:20:18.130 –> 00:20:18.970
No, no, no.

488
00:20:19.090 –> 00:20:19.830
Because I could see it.

489
00:20:19.890 –> 00:20:21.170
She’s second-screening again.

490
00:20:21.310 –> 00:20:22.150
Yeah, hang on a sec, Jo.

491
00:20:23.170 –> 00:20:25.030
Well, Jo’s the winner in this week’s Hot Takes.

492
00:20:25.030 –> 00:20:26.110
Well, thank you, well done, Jo.

493
00:20:26.130 –> 00:20:26.570
Hi, thank you.

494
00:20:28.730 –> 00:20:31.750
So let’s talk about metrics in sponsorship.

495
00:20:32.410 –> 00:20:33.890
So previous sponsored metrics

496
00:20:33.890 –> 00:20:35.490
would have been based around impressions,

497
00:20:35.930 –> 00:20:37.510
logo appearances, time on screen.

498
00:20:37.830 –> 00:20:39.130
We talked a lot about that earlier, Jo,

499
00:20:39.130 –> 00:20:40.390
in terms of how that’s actually getting measured.

500
00:20:41.030 –> 00:20:43.030
New metrics now, we’re talking about impact,

501
00:20:43.590 –> 00:20:46.530
emotion, action taken, and how that’s all tracked.

502
00:20:47.590 –> 00:20:48.350
Any thoughts on that?

503
00:20:48.730 –> 00:20:51.530
They’re pretty soft metrics, aren’t they?

504
00:20:51.590 –> 00:20:52.230
Yeah. Soft skills.

505
00:20:52.550 –> 00:20:52.770
Yeah.

506
00:20:52.770 –> 00:20:53.550
I’d expect more.

507
00:20:53.550 –> 00:20:56.930
I’d expect, well, I think if you want to,

508
00:20:58.110 –> 00:21:01.410
when I was working for a OTT platform that did sports,

509
00:21:03.930 –> 00:21:06.670
they did the McDonald’s Monopoly campaign,

510
00:21:06.770 –> 00:21:09.110
and that generated a million subscribers

511
00:21:09.110 –> 00:21:10.450
by giving out promo codes.

512
00:21:10.490 –> 00:21:13.270
And that’s trackable because it was a gift code.

513
00:21:13.370 –> 00:21:14.770
You had to enter it in, obviously,

514
00:21:14.870 –> 00:21:17.850
through the McDonald’s Monopoly activation.

515
00:21:18.430 –> 00:21:19.150
And that’s trackable.

516
00:21:19.150 –> 00:21:20.790
And that’s what I think in terms of metrics now.

517
00:21:20.790 –> 00:21:22.670
I think that’s what sponsors go through.

518
00:21:23.270 –> 00:21:25.470
It’s a classic conversion funnel

519
00:21:25.470 –> 00:21:27.150
that no one likes to talk about anymore,

520
00:21:27.290 –> 00:21:30.090
which was, you’ve got this many people view the page,

521
00:21:30.410 –> 00:21:31.790
you have this many people click through,

522
00:21:31.990 –> 00:21:33.370
there’s the drop off rates at each point,

523
00:21:33.390 –> 00:21:37.370
but ultimately, some measurable return at the end of it

524
00:21:37.370 –> 00:21:38.410
that you can actually pick your hat on.

525
00:21:38.410 –> 00:21:40.050
Which is fine, because it’s measurable.

526
00:21:40.650 –> 00:21:43.270
Does, but then it’s measurable at the moment

527
00:21:43.270 –> 00:21:46.750
that that fan downloads the app and subscribes.

528
00:21:46.830 –> 00:21:49.370
But if it’s a free month, how many churn?

529
00:21:49.770 –> 00:21:51.730
So then it’s what happens after that.

530
00:21:51.730 –> 00:21:55.190
We were talking about new metrics are action taken.

531
00:21:55.730 –> 00:21:57.330
Well, action taken is immediate,

532
00:21:57.370 –> 00:21:58.670
but if it’s not sustained,

533
00:21:58.870 –> 00:22:00.890
or if that action is then undone after a month,

534
00:22:00.950 –> 00:22:01.990
because you’ve got to start paying,

535
00:22:03.270 –> 00:22:06.290
does that make your sponsorship effective or not?

536
00:22:06.670 –> 00:22:07.310
I would argue not.

537
00:22:07.550 –> 00:22:09.010
Yeah, I’ll guess that they’ll have a view though

538
00:22:09.010 –> 00:22:10.110
of the ultimate that we know,

539
00:22:10.430 –> 00:22:13.090
or they’ll have a target of how many they want to acquire

540
00:22:13.090 –> 00:22:14.450
from the initial action,

541
00:22:14.610 –> 00:22:16.950
but also a target of what they want to retain

542
00:22:16.950 –> 00:22:17.870
thereafter, right?

543
00:22:17.870 –> 00:22:19.650
And you know, you’re always going to get churned

544
00:22:19.650 –> 00:22:21.030
from that initial act,

545
00:22:21.030 –> 00:22:23.270
but the fact that they manage to drive people into it

546
00:22:23.270 –> 00:22:24.750
is a success as a starting point.

547
00:22:24.930 –> 00:22:26.410
And then again, whatever churns up for that.

548
00:22:26.430 –> 00:22:29.330
So it’s part of this issue with measurement also though.

549
00:22:29.430 –> 00:22:30.950
Because retention’s not on them at that point, right?

550
00:22:31.070 –> 00:22:31.670
Well, this is it.

551
00:22:31.910 –> 00:22:34.130
Lies down lies and statistics, isn’t it?

552
00:22:34.430 –> 00:22:37.070
Because if it makes a good press release.

553
00:22:38.130 –> 00:22:40.370
But also it could just be forming new habits, right?

554
00:22:41.170 –> 00:22:42.870
Because, you know, there’s certain things

555
00:22:42.870 –> 00:22:45.590
that you don’t frequently renew, right?

556
00:22:45.630 –> 00:22:46.950
You know, or you don’t do recently,

557
00:22:47.070 –> 00:22:48.250
or you change your car recently,

558
00:22:48.290 –> 00:22:49.850
but when’s the last time you change your car?

559
00:22:49.870 –> 00:22:50.290
Do you know what I mean?

560
00:22:50.710 –> 00:22:52.390
Every four years, three, four years, yeah.

561
00:22:52.570 –> 00:22:53.070
Yeah, so you see what I mean?

562
00:22:53.250 –> 00:22:55.190
So there’s a difference, I guess it depends,

563
00:22:55.230 –> 00:22:57.190
again, depends on the product and service that you want.

564
00:22:57.390 –> 00:22:58.230
And actually, some of the time,

565
00:22:58.530 –> 00:23:01.850
what you’re actually asking for is measured interaction.

566
00:23:02.210 –> 00:23:02.950
So like, if you want,

567
00:23:03.070 –> 00:23:05.150
if you’re trying to get someone to engage with your

568
00:23:05.150 –> 00:23:07.690
brand, it might just be that like, to your point, Joe,

569
00:23:07.950 –> 00:23:11.190
that they landed on the homepage

570
00:23:11.190 –> 00:23:13.270
and then they kept repeating the website

571
00:23:13.270 –> 00:23:13.910
and that things.

572
00:23:14.210 –> 00:23:15.710
I think actually the best example,

573
00:23:15.770 –> 00:23:16.810
which we haven’t talked about,

574
00:23:16.830 –> 00:23:18.770
which we’ve talked about in a previous podcast,

575
00:23:18.770 –> 00:23:21.990
was the Topgolf activation on Roblox.

576
00:23:22.290 –> 00:23:22.390
Yeah.

577
00:23:22.510 –> 00:23:25.230
I mean, that’s the one that’s funny.

578
00:23:25.670 –> 00:23:27.350
Here’s a question from me as someone

579
00:23:27.350 –> 00:23:30.330
who doesn’t necessarily understand this space.

580
00:23:31.350 –> 00:23:34.070
What is the distinction between sponsorship and partnership

581
00:23:34.070 –> 00:23:35.310
or are they one and the same?

582
00:23:36.030 –> 00:23:37.310
I think they’re one and the same.

583
00:23:37.450 –> 00:23:38.210
I think they used to be,

584
00:23:38.290 –> 00:23:39.830
a sponsorship one used to be,

585
00:23:40.270 –> 00:23:43.110
pay your logo and we’re just gonna give you some money

586
00:23:43.110 –> 00:23:44.530
and everyone was kind of happy

587
00:23:44.530 –> 00:23:45.630
because I’ve done my job.

588
00:23:45.630 –> 00:23:46.290
That makes sense.

589
00:23:46.510 –> 00:23:48.750
So that’s pretty transactional.

590
00:23:48.750 –> 00:23:52.030
More like actually each one is helping each other.

591
00:23:52.190 –> 00:23:52.610
It’s long-term.

592
00:23:53.110 –> 00:23:53.470
More of a relationship.

593
00:23:53.470 –> 00:23:56.610
So that’s what I would say was the Topgolf

594
00:23:56.610 –> 00:23:58.270
and RNA partnership.

595
00:23:58.290 –> 00:24:00.150
In theory all sponsorships should be partnerships.

596
00:24:02.270 –> 00:24:04.890
So, yes, semantics aside,

597
00:24:05.110 –> 00:24:07.890
that was one that worked really well for both partners

598
00:24:07.890 –> 00:24:09.970
because one wanted foot traffic

599
00:24:09.970 –> 00:24:13.230
and the other one wanted to increase participation

600
00:24:13.230 –> 00:24:16.690
and understanding of the mechanics of golf

601
00:24:16.690 –> 00:24:19.110
and both hit the mark for both.

602
00:24:19.450 –> 00:24:22.350
So actually, I mean, partnership is the better way

603
00:24:22.350 –> 00:24:23.010
to describe it then

604
00:24:23.010 –> 00:24:25.750
because that implies it’s a more equal relationship

605
00:24:25.750 –> 00:24:27.410
than one just transacting with another

606
00:24:27.410 –> 00:24:29.510
and it might be a little bit out of balance.

607
00:24:30.090 –> 00:24:30.570
So what did it get you?

608
00:24:31.370 –> 00:24:33.050
So Relometrics and Sponsor Plus

609
00:24:33.050 –> 00:24:34.130
have created a new metric

610
00:24:34.130 –> 00:24:36.170
that’s being used in the NHL now.

611
00:24:37.410 –> 00:24:39.890
So an asset to do impact scoring, right?

612
00:24:39.970 –> 00:24:41.510
So based on those, you haven’t perhaps said earlier,

613
00:24:41.870 –> 00:24:43.330
and there’s five key qualities for that.

614
00:24:43.510 –> 00:24:45.470
So recall, it’s a sponsor logo and memorable.

615
00:24:45.470 –> 00:24:48.230
So it’s kind of the stuff that we would have had already.

616
00:24:48.230 –> 00:24:49.130
Like, do you see it?

617
00:24:49.170 –> 00:24:50.570
Can you remember it?

618
00:24:51.410 –> 00:24:53.490
When it’s whizzing by at 120 miles an hour

619
00:24:53.490 –> 00:24:54.990
on a wheel arch.

620
00:24:55.390 –> 00:24:55.830
Annoyance.

621
00:24:55.890 –> 00:24:58.150
Is the logo signage distracting you

622
00:24:58.150 –> 00:25:00.010
from your enjoyment of that particular sport?

623
00:25:00.270 –> 00:25:01.170
Oh, that’s interesting.

624
00:25:01.910 –> 00:25:02.130
Action.

625
00:25:02.250 –> 00:25:04.210
Does the logo have the ability to drive an action?

626
00:25:04.410 –> 00:25:05.470
Why is it all about logos?

627
00:25:06.070 –> 00:25:06.230
Still.

628
00:25:06.490 –> 00:25:09.070
I mean, I think just logo, like the brand.

629
00:25:09.310 –> 00:25:10.550
Is that what sponsorship is?

630
00:25:10.590 –> 00:25:11.210
Just logos?

631
00:25:11.270 –> 00:25:13.010
Yeah, but I think that’s just where you view it.

632
00:25:13.010 –> 00:25:15.430
It’s a term they call it in the industry, Joe.

633
00:25:15.730 –> 00:25:15.950
Purchase.

634
00:25:16.530 –> 00:25:16.930
Purchase.

635
00:25:17.230 –> 00:25:18.370
Does the particular activation,

636
00:25:18.390 –> 00:25:19.670
just because I hate you, you hate the word logo,

637
00:25:20.190 –> 00:25:22.070
have the ability to drive consideration?

638
00:25:24.290 –> 00:25:25.090
And favorability.

639
00:25:25.270 –> 00:25:27.710
Does the asset have the ability to drive preference?

640
00:25:29.390 –> 00:25:29.550
Interesting.

641
00:25:29.590 –> 00:25:30.550
I guess Coca-Cola or Pepsi might.

642
00:25:30.550 –> 00:25:31.750
So some of that is a bit of words.

643
00:25:31.750 –> 00:25:33.570
If you like Pepsi, well, you’d switch to Coke.

644
00:25:33.590 –> 00:25:34.250
Oh, gosh.

645
00:25:34.870 –> 00:25:37.990
By 0.5, it was word salad territory for us all.

646
00:25:38.010 –> 00:25:39.910
It was definitely, that’s definitely an agency.

647
00:25:39.990 –> 00:25:41.670
Yeah, that’s an agency metric that’s been-

648
00:25:41.670 –> 00:25:44.390
0.5 is word salad, so you can park that.

649
00:25:45.750 –> 00:25:49.570
But recall annoyance, action, purchase, favorability.

650
00:25:50.250 –> 00:25:51.630
I mean, favorability is what I feel like they just want to find.

651
00:25:51.630 –> 00:25:53.230
Annoyance is an interesting one.

652
00:25:53.810 –> 00:25:55.950
Because normally you go for all positive

653
00:25:55.950 –> 00:25:58.270
when you’re trying to measure something, don’t you?

654
00:25:58.390 –> 00:26:02.190
But it’s just as interesting to measure negatives

655
00:26:02.190 –> 00:26:05.510
because that can really highlight the positive side of things.

656
00:26:05.830 –> 00:26:07.430
Is the logo or signage distracting?

657
00:26:07.690 –> 00:26:09.230
I come back to some of the things,

658
00:26:09.230 –> 00:26:12.190
the digital logos that are put onto the field of play.

659
00:26:12.210 –> 00:26:13.390
I was just about to say the same thing.

660
00:26:13.550 –> 00:26:14.890
Jeez, they are so annoying.

661
00:26:15.270 –> 00:26:17.230
I see them first, but I find

662
00:26:17.230 –> 00:26:18.690
that within a relatively short space of time,

663
00:26:18.830 –> 00:26:19.610
I’ve switched off from it.

664
00:26:20.510 –> 00:26:21.830
But have you switched off from the logo

665
00:26:21.830 –> 00:26:23.110
or have you switched off from the play?

666
00:26:23.130 –> 00:26:23.750
I was from the logo.

667
00:26:24.230 –> 00:26:25.730
Like I tend to like, yeah.

668
00:26:25.830 –> 00:26:27.030
It’s got a white noise almost,

669
00:26:27.030 –> 00:26:27.830
you just kind of look at it now.

670
00:26:27.850 –> 00:26:29.690
Yeah, I almost get used to the switch off from it.

671
00:26:29.930 –> 00:26:31.030
What I don’t get switched off from

672
00:26:31.030 –> 00:26:32.870
is when I’m seeing like LED perimeter now where,

673
00:26:32.910 –> 00:26:34.510
well, ultimately, they’re advertising them,

674
00:26:34.510 –> 00:26:35.250
but they’re all partners.

675
00:26:36.250 –> 00:26:39.130
When you see two or three levels of it now,

676
00:26:39.130 –> 00:26:40.730
it’s like, no.

677
00:26:41.090 –> 00:26:41.630
So blinding, yeah, yeah.

678
00:26:41.630 –> 00:26:43.370
And that, it’s too much, like.

679
00:26:43.950 –> 00:26:47.270
Honestly, just thinking about your stats,

680
00:26:47.510 –> 00:26:48.870
your new measurements there.

681
00:26:49.370 –> 00:26:49.590
It’s not mine.

682
00:26:50.270 –> 00:26:52.090
Yeah, you Ed, specifically you.

683
00:26:52.770 –> 00:26:54.550
They’re just really bad sold metrics.

684
00:26:54.910 –> 00:26:55.510
Of course they are.

685
00:26:55.750 –> 00:26:56.890
I know, I’m just reading them again.

686
00:26:57.130 –> 00:26:58.210
Action, point three.

687
00:26:58.410 –> 00:27:01.070
Does the logo have the ability to drive action?

688
00:27:01.390 –> 00:27:01.770
What?

689
00:27:02.150 –> 00:27:03.950
It’s like, did you buy something basically?

690
00:27:04.690 –> 00:27:07.510
Surely that was in marketing books from 25 years ago.

691
00:27:07.630 –> 00:27:08.890
But it’s like, did you see it?

692
00:27:08.890 –> 00:27:09.810
Did it piss you off?

693
00:27:09.930 –> 00:27:10.730
Did you buy anything?

694
00:27:11.070 –> 00:27:12.030
I think the one that.

695
00:27:12.030 –> 00:27:12.930
Did it make you do anything different?

696
00:27:12.930 –> 00:27:15.330
Okay, we’ve just invented our own metrics.

697
00:27:15.750 –> 00:27:17.210
Sentimental analysis is an interesting one

698
00:27:17.210 –> 00:27:19.610
because I think that is, that’s probably a newer,

699
00:27:19.810 –> 00:27:21.950
it is probably a newer metric, which is like,

700
00:27:22.110 –> 00:27:23.470
how do you, what do you feel

701
00:27:23.470 –> 00:27:24.370
about the brand is social brand.

702
00:27:24.450 –> 00:27:26.250
People try and do that now, but I think they are now,

703
00:27:26.410 –> 00:27:28.490
there are ways that you can try and quantify this more,

704
00:27:28.930 –> 00:27:30.810
especially with things like social media

705
00:27:30.810 –> 00:27:32.590
and the way that you can track likes.

706
00:27:32.730 –> 00:27:34.350
Now likes is obviously a vanity metric,

707
00:27:34.610 –> 00:27:36.810
but you can definitely see, especially with AI now,

708
00:27:36.810 –> 00:27:38.630
across like Twitter, X or Twitter,

709
00:27:38.890 –> 00:27:40.930
you can see what people are saying about a brand.

710
00:27:40.970 –> 00:27:43.870
So if you do an activation or an advert

711
00:27:43.870 –> 00:27:46.390
and it doesn’t resonate, you’re gonna know very quickly,

712
00:27:46.390 –> 00:27:47.750
which gives you that sort of sentiment.

713
00:27:47.770 –> 00:27:49.630
So it’s gonna see how do people feel.

714
00:27:50.330 –> 00:27:51.350
That’s an interesting one.

715
00:27:51.610 –> 00:27:53.230
Does that deliver you ultimate ROI

716
00:27:53.710 –> 00:27:55.050
as it tells you what to do?

717
00:27:55.130 –> 00:27:56.570
Tells you what to keep doing more of,

718
00:27:56.570 –> 00:27:57.610
but I don’t know.

719
00:27:58.670 –> 00:27:59.550
I think it’s.

720
00:28:00.250 –> 00:28:00.590
I think you’re right about ROI.

721
00:28:00.590 –> 00:28:02.810
Are we essentially saying it’s not a science

722
00:28:02.810 –> 00:28:05.830
and we’re never gonna be able to measure it

723
00:28:05.830 –> 00:28:06.810
truly effectively,

724
00:28:07.070 –> 00:28:09.610
which means that fuzzy ROI will ever be fuzzy.

725
00:28:09.850 –> 00:28:13.230
I think with any, like in the context of sentiment analysis,

726
00:28:13.390 –> 00:28:14.010
right, it’s kind of like, all right,

727
00:28:14.030 –> 00:28:14.810
how’s that being tracked?

728
00:28:14.910 –> 00:28:17.810
How’s that being appended some way

729
00:28:17.810 –> 00:28:19.350
to understand how a certain,

730
00:28:19.810 –> 00:28:21.310
it’s gonna be really, really hard, right,

731
00:28:21.310 –> 00:28:22.710
to do that at an individual level,

732
00:28:22.710 –> 00:28:23.770
but at least the demographic,

733
00:28:23.810 –> 00:28:25.450
like understanding what that sentiment is

734
00:28:25.450 –> 00:28:26.950
and how you’re appending that demographic

735
00:28:26.950 –> 00:28:29.430
to understand then how they respond

736
00:28:29.430 –> 00:28:32.790
to your marketing message through that partnership.

737
00:28:33.350 –> 00:28:35.810
Look, we’re doing an anonymous fan survey at the moment

738
00:28:35.810 –> 00:28:37.450
and we’re trying to understand that from rights holders

739
00:28:37.450 –> 00:28:38.790
in terms of how are you tracking

740
00:28:38.790 –> 00:28:40.110
all of these things that are going on,

741
00:28:40.110 –> 00:28:41.670
whether it’s for yourself

742
00:28:41.670 –> 00:28:42.870
or whether it’s for the brands

743
00:28:42.870 –> 00:28:45.030
that ultimately sponsor what you’re doing.

744
00:28:45.430 –> 00:28:46.650
There’s got to be some kind,

745
00:28:46.870 –> 00:28:48.530
it’s pointless doing these things in isolation, right,

746
00:28:48.530 –> 00:28:51.110
if you’re not then appending it to your actual audience.

747
00:28:51.510 –> 00:28:52.730
But often these things happen like that

748
00:28:52.730 –> 00:28:53.410
and they’re in silos.

749
00:28:53.490 –> 00:28:54.230
Do you think it’s gonna,

750
00:28:54.250 –> 00:28:55.750
do you, I mean, everyone sit,

751
00:28:55.990 –> 00:28:58.570
it’s interesting because you’ve talked about before

752
00:28:58.570 –> 00:29:00.110
about everyone leaders saying,

753
00:29:00.710 –> 00:29:02.470
it’s a worrying time for the sponsorship market.

754
00:29:02.470 –> 00:29:04.590
We’ve just read a report that says market,

755
00:29:04.990 –> 00:29:06.210
the value is gonna double.

756
00:29:06.590 –> 00:29:08.030
Actually, what if it doesn’t?

757
00:29:08.370 –> 00:29:10.510
Like, you know, like money’s getting more expensive,

758
00:29:11.290 –> 00:29:12.150
people’s, you know,

759
00:29:12.270 –> 00:29:14.150
somebody’s gonna have to give, you know, somewhere.

760
00:29:14.590 –> 00:29:17.570
And actually these big sort of headline sponsorships

761
00:29:17.570 –> 00:29:20.430
that which in essence what we’re talking about,

762
00:29:20.830 –> 00:29:22.750
once they’re, they could all fall away.

763
00:29:22.770 –> 00:29:24.310
And actually what’s gonna happen is

764
00:29:24.310 –> 00:29:25.650
unless you have that sort of

765
00:29:25.650 –> 00:29:26.950
hyper personalized targeted brand,

766
00:29:26.970 –> 00:29:31.010
which actually is so directly associated with your sport.

767
00:29:31.090 –> 00:29:31.930
So let’s say it’s football

768
00:29:31.930 –> 00:29:33.510
and you want to buy a football kit

769
00:29:33.510 –> 00:29:35.750
or it’s associated to the athletes.

770
00:29:35.770 –> 00:29:38.730
So it’s a makeup brand that, you know, to a lone man.

771
00:29:39.430 –> 00:29:40.530
Those are the things that are gonna stick,

772
00:29:40.530 –> 00:29:42.550
but everything else is kind of like

773
00:29:42.550 –> 00:29:44.830
team viewer type sponsorships, you know,

774
00:29:44.930 –> 00:29:46.470
or that don’t really resonate,

775
00:29:46.590 –> 00:29:48.370
that don’t really have a target audience

776
00:29:48.370 –> 00:29:49.370
with your fans.

777
00:29:50.010 –> 00:29:51.310
Isn’t that money just gonna go away?

778
00:29:52.210 –> 00:29:53.670
You don’t want to be better just sticking a QR code

779
00:29:53.670 –> 00:29:54.650
on front of the football shirts.

780
00:29:55.250 –> 00:29:55.310
You shouldn’t.

781
00:29:57.390 –> 00:29:58.190
You should do.

782
00:29:58.190 –> 00:29:59.590
Do you know how much activation you get

783
00:29:59.590 –> 00:30:00.270
for just putting a QR code.

784
00:30:00.270 –> 00:30:01.650
I do wonder as well,

785
00:30:01.810 –> 00:30:03.670
how much of the sponsorship money is

786
00:30:03.670 –> 00:30:05.510
just because they wouldn’t know what else to do with it.

787
00:30:05.630 –> 00:30:06.730
Well, they have to get it off their PNL.

788
00:30:06.970 –> 00:30:08.010
Yeah, they have to spend it somewhere.

789
00:30:08.370 –> 00:30:09.350
Yeah, yeah, yeah.

790
00:30:10.550 –> 00:30:11.230
Well, that’s deep.

791
00:30:11.290 –> 00:30:12.910
I know, it’s profound.

792
00:30:13.250 –> 00:30:13.590
On that note.

793
00:30:13.770 –> 00:30:14.950
They could give it to us.

794
00:30:15.130 –> 00:30:15.950
Yeah, yeah, yeah.

795
00:30:15.950 –> 00:30:17.790
And we’ll create you a podcast.

796
00:30:18.250 –> 00:30:19.250
Not sure we could track it though.

797
00:30:22.230 –> 00:30:22.530
Cool.

798
00:30:23.330 –> 00:30:27.830
So, any thoughts to wrap up today’s episode?

799
00:30:28.350 –> 00:30:29.930
I mean, word salad aside,

800
00:30:29.930 –> 00:30:31.870
at least somebody is having a go

801
00:30:31.870 –> 00:30:35.730
at trying to figure out how you measure the ROI on this

802
00:30:35.730 –> 00:30:38.950
given that most people don’t seem to know what it is.

803
00:30:39.330 –> 00:30:40.770
I like the annoyance one, yeah.

804
00:30:41.110 –> 00:30:44.610
I think it’s worth looking at the negatives side

805
00:30:44.610 –> 00:30:45.610
as well as the positive.

806
00:30:46.150 –> 00:30:48.310
I’m still a little bit confused

807
00:30:48.310 –> 00:30:51.650
as to what sponsorship is,

808
00:30:51.710 –> 00:30:53.370
if it’s increasing at such a rate

809
00:30:54.150 –> 00:30:55.610
and marketeers are saying,

810
00:30:55.690 –> 00:30:57.610
yes, we’re gonna increase our investment in sponsorship.

811
00:30:57.610 –> 00:31:01.350
If they don’t know what result it’s delivering,

812
00:31:01.950 –> 00:31:03.470
why would you be throwing more money at it?

813
00:31:03.690 –> 00:31:07.010
What’s the incentive for rights holders

814
00:31:07.010 –> 00:31:09.130
to be better at activating sponsorships

815
00:31:09.130 –> 00:31:10.770
if they’re being told that it’s gonna double

816
00:31:10.770 –> 00:31:12.010
in the next however many years?

817
00:31:12.010 –> 00:31:12.510
Yeah, exactly.

818
00:31:12.730 –> 00:31:14.950
When they’re not doing a great job of not activating it.

819
00:31:15.530 –> 00:31:17.510
There’s no motivation to improve.

820
00:31:17.670 –> 00:31:19.670
I think this is a classic example

821
00:31:19.670 –> 00:31:22.030
of what everyone said about the sports media rights deals,

822
00:31:22.210 –> 00:31:23.330
that they’re just gonna keep going up

823
00:31:23.330 –> 00:31:24.150
and keep going up.

824
00:31:24.490 –> 00:31:25.950
And the hope that it just works, everyone says it.

825
00:31:25.950 –> 00:31:27.330
I hope they will, because no one knows how,

826
00:31:27.370 –> 00:31:29.190
it’s one of those things, it’s an illusion, right?

827
00:31:29.190 –> 00:31:30.330
No one knows the value of it.

828
00:31:30.690 –> 00:31:32.050
No one knows how to do anything of it.

829
00:31:32.190 –> 00:31:33.850
And I think the things that are gonna resonate

830
00:31:33.850 –> 00:31:35.130
are when people do it properly,

831
00:31:35.370 –> 00:31:36.210
people who do it well.

832
00:31:36.370 –> 00:31:37.930
Like the example you gave about the marathon

833
00:31:37.930 –> 00:31:39.990
and where you get those closer collaborations

834
00:31:40.630 –> 00:31:42.410
between athletes and who’ve got an audience

835
00:31:42.410 –> 00:31:43.390
and they know it’s there,

836
00:31:43.450 –> 00:31:44.850
it’s on brand with them,

837
00:31:45.210 –> 00:31:46.090
then I think they’re doing that.

838
00:31:46.170 –> 00:31:47.510
The only thing I’d caveat with that was saying,

839
00:31:48.670 –> 00:31:50.130
you need to, there’s way,

840
00:31:50.530 –> 00:31:51.430
we live in a digital world

841
00:31:51.430 –> 00:31:54.170
where everyone could scan a QR code or enter a GIF code.

842
00:31:54.170 –> 00:31:57.070
You need to make sure that as much as possible,

843
00:31:57.070 –> 00:31:58.170
you’re tracking this,

844
00:31:58.190 –> 00:31:59.170
because I think that’s it.

845
00:31:59.270 –> 00:32:00.670
Even if you can’t get it now,

846
00:32:00.670 –> 00:32:02.410
you’ll build up a database of knowledge

847
00:32:02.410 –> 00:32:04.510
that you can shove some AI over the top of it

848
00:32:04.510 –> 00:32:06.890
and over spot those gaps in the market.

849
00:32:08.070 –> 00:32:09.850
Well, I mean, I see,

850
00:32:09.850 –> 00:32:11.770
you see a lot of activations physically

851
00:32:11.770 –> 00:32:13.970
in and around sporting venues.

852
00:32:14.030 –> 00:32:15.210
What I don’t see a lot of is

853
00:32:15.210 –> 00:32:16.710
how that’s been activated digitally

854
00:32:16.710 –> 00:32:18.610
around digital video and content.

855
00:32:19.290 –> 00:32:21.910
Yeah, you see, so I’m always amazed

856
00:32:22.910 –> 00:32:25.330
at the relatively few activations I see

857
00:32:25.330 –> 00:32:28.610
around game days, match days with brands

858
00:32:28.610 –> 00:32:30.870
in terms of whoever they’re involved with.

859
00:32:30.950 –> 00:32:32.410
I just don’t see a great deal of it.

860
00:32:32.410 –> 00:32:34.730
Certainly not on my social timelines or on YouTube.

861
00:32:35.270 –> 00:32:36.330
I think there needs to be a lot more of that.

862
00:32:36.330 –> 00:32:38.030
I don’t think that gets considered nearly enough,

863
00:32:38.050 –> 00:32:39.410
because I think that for me is the one way

864
00:32:39.410 –> 00:32:40.910
that you could just do an instant,

865
00:32:41.150 –> 00:32:42.510
I’ve seen it react to it, do something,

866
00:32:42.530 –> 00:32:43.870
because it’s easy to link through

867
00:32:43.870 –> 00:32:46.430
to somewhere else and track it.

868
00:32:47.030 –> 00:32:48.170
Cool, and on that bombs, yeah.

869
00:32:48.290 –> 00:32:50.250
And you can also sponsor the attention shift.

870
00:32:50.790 –> 00:32:52.250
We will measure our ROI.

871
00:32:52.350 –> 00:32:53.730
We’ll put some QR codes or something.

872
00:32:53.910 –> 00:32:54.750
Yeah, we’ll go with that.

873
00:32:55.230 –> 00:32:56.350
With our new RELLO metrics.

874
00:32:57.350 –> 00:32:58.690
Thank you for tuning in.

875
00:32:58.890 –> 00:32:59.930
You’ve been Ed Abbotts.

876
00:32:59.930 –> 00:33:01.530
I’ve been Jo Redford.

877
00:33:01.730 –> 00:33:02.970
Apparently I’m Lee Rapport.

878
00:33:04.150 –> 00:33:06.030
Well, yeah, if you like to like and subscribe,

879
00:33:06.110 –> 00:33:07.770
or if you’ve got any sponsorship inquiries,

880
00:33:07.930 –> 00:33:11.230
please email us at helloattheattentionshift.media.

881
00:33:11.350 –> 00:33:13.410
That’s helloattheattentionshift.media.

882
00:33:16.680 –> 00:33:18.720
That’s it for this episode of The Attention Shift.

883
00:33:18.900 –> 00:33:21.300
Remember to like and subscribe and listen in next time.

884
00:33:21.300 –> 00:33:22.860
And do let us know what you think.

885
00:33:23.100 –> 00:33:26.420
Email us at hello@attentionshift.media.

886
00:33:26.620 –> 00:33:29.440
So that’s hello@attentionshift.media.

Share

Hosts & Guests

Hosts

Ed Abis: Dizplai, CEO
Lee Radbourne: Streaming Consultancy, Founder
Jo Redfern: Futrhood Media, CEO

 

Dizplai's featured work

Latest Episodes Latest Episodes

Latest Episodes

Joe Darkins | Burnley F.C’s First CTO, Modernising Football Tech & Connecting Fan Behaviours!

How do you turn a 142-year-old football club into a tech-led global brand without losing what makes it special?

Joe Darkins, Burnley FC’s first-ever CTO, reveals the reality of football’s digital transformation; from fixing broken Wi-Fi to building a single view of the fan, stopping ticket touting, and making cyber security the club’s top priority. This is what happens when a historic, community-focused club decides technology isn’t just nice to have, it’s crucial to its survival.

Listen & Watch